and
The first charge. for this the action was brought-
dismissed for
was
the same reason; but Mr.
Mitchell, who dismissed it could not be called on either
Side,
شه ام
The presided, at the Inquiry in question, in his capacity of Sheriff .
So
punish this offender,
und to deter Chinamen in general from wearying the Magistrary with humped up charges like that before
me
and such are
frequent,
OG
very
I am credibly
informed _ I certainly did
22
determine, as Mr. Parson's states.
to put
on his
man on
hial, whatever might be the issue of the then
pending Inquest of Damages. But it is not
true that I committed the
man
was
himself :- he
the Sheriff
committed by
upons my Application. Had a higher judicial functionary presided, my Application would have been to commit, not for hial, but summarily,
in
contempt, and for a term
certain.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.